The Long, Hard Tack Back To Bountiful

In the two decades since the federally imposed cod moratorium, the East Coast fishery has staged a comeback thanks to higher-value species and products, savvier international marketing, and smarter resource management. Still, many in the industry now worry the region is perilously close to repeating its old mistakes. What will it take to create a truly sustainable livelihood for the men and women who go down to the sea in boats?

E. DEREK BUTLER IS RARELY at a loss for words. He snatches them easily from the thick fog of metaphor that invariably hangs above the port city of St. John’s at the edge of the North American consciousness. Of course, that doesn’t mean the executive director of the Association of Seafood Producers of Newfoundland and Labrador is always, or even necessarily, trenchant in his choice of analogies. “Well, now, let me ask you this,” he chirps from his downtown office. “What if you are running a magazine and you have to put out an issue on a regular basis, except you have to do it all in, say, a few weeks? Or what if you own a coffee shop, or a restaurant, or a hotel and expect to make money, only you have to do it all in just a few days? What we have here is a situation where everybody who comes into Tim Horton’s winds up drinking out of the same small cup of coffee.  You know what I mean?”

Not really. Maybe his tale about the kid and the plane crash might serve to clarify. “When a baby was killed in the western USA in 1989 by being ripped out of its mother’s arms and dashed up against the bulkhead,” he regaled a St. John’s Rotary Club luncheon in 2008, amid (one can only assume) the sound of forks dropping to their plates, “a political solution was proposed by having a federal law requiring babies to be strapped into their own seats on airplanes.”

His point: “Such a law, requiring parents to purchase an extra seat, would divert a portion of the traffic to cheaper, alternative modes of transportation on the ground – most of which have higher mortality rates than airplanes, the result being that over a period of a decade, there would be an estimated saving of one baby’s life in airplane crashes, a loss of nine lives in alternative ground transportation, and an additional cost of $3-billion.” Now, do you know what he means? Never mind; it’s sufficient that he does. And it is, perhaps, a measure of the complexity, the byzantine intricacy, of the Atlantic Canadian fishery – with its thousands of harvesters, hundreds of processors, dozens of species, boatloads of rules and regulations, and footlockers of marine science – that Butler, and others like him, routinely employ arrestingly discursive ways to frame the major challenge now facing one of the East Coast’s most iconic and economically significant industries.

But strip away the convolutions and the contrived figures of speech used to illuminate them, and the central problem remains as plain as it is achingly familiar: In the second decade of the 21st Century, too many people still chase too few fish in Atlantic waters, a circumstance that undermines the industry’s competitiveness and its ability to provide a decent living. Even more ominous is evidence of incipient resource depletion as the federal government (which issues and administers commercial fishing licenses) and provincial governments (which regulate and manage on-shore processing functions) continue to favour policies that encourage over-capacity in the interest of creating and maintaining jobs regardless of how impoverished these positions actually are.

All of which have generated an unusual degree of unanimity among the industry’s private-sector stakeholders about the future of their way of life. Nearly everyone interviewed for this piece, from small-timers to large-scale fleet operators, from seafood producers to union organizers, says some form of rationalization is necessary to build long-term sustainability. The nagging question, of course, is how.

“As commercial fishermen, we owe it to ourselves and to the resource to take on much of the responsibility ourselves,” says Gerard Chidley, the newely appointed chairman of the federally appointed Fisheries Resource Conservation Council (FRCC), an advisory body, and a crab and shrimp harvester who operates a vessel out of Renews, Newfoundland. “We can’t leave everything up to the governments. We can’t blame everything on DFO. We have to take every opportunity to streamline ourselves, to inject some business sense into our own practices.”

Jean-Guy d’Entremont, the outgoing chairman of FRCC, and a 30-year veteran of the southwest Nova Scotia ground fishery, agrees. “The notion that this industry is permanently unsustainable is simply wrong,” he says. “Where I fish, we knew we had to change and we had to change to higher quality and to greater efficiency. We had to have operations that provide opportunities to attract young people. It’s about business: You have to be able to pay people properly and give them enough challenge to keep them in their careers. And we’ve been able to do that.”

To Eric Roe, chief operating officer of Halifax-based Clearwater Seafoods, which is one of the biggest, vertically integrated players on the East Coast – and one of the world’s leading lobster fishers – a crucial long-term issue is protecting the ocean’s bounty. “Sustainability requires some sort of policy regime that guards against over-capacity in the fishery,” he says. “This requires political will to not respond in knee-jerk fashion to fishing license capacity, or plant processing capacity. I tend to favour those regimes that allow industry, itself, to manage its own affairs in a responsible fashion.”

Indeed, says Earl McCurdy, St. John’s-based president of the Fish, Food and Allied Workers Union, “Some people look at rationalization as just a numbers game. We don’t share that view at all. Our goal is to improve incomes and to improve the stability of fishing enterprises. Fleet rationalization is certainly one of the options. Still, the way things are, the number of licenses right now makes it very, very difficult for all concerned. The simplest approach would be a straight license buy-back. Unfortunately, the federal government has shown zero interest in this.”

For Derek Butler, who can’t resist his metaphors, the nub of the problem is ideological. “Ours is still a social fishery,” he says. “It’s a fishery where the goal for many has been to employ as many people as possible as opposed to building an industry that increases in value and produces returns for both harvesters and processors. Remember that baby in the airplane crash? You can save that one, but in exchange for how many more, and at what cost? And is that the goal of public policy? To save one part of a business, and sacrifice so many others?”

Then again, one might wonder, how many babies must go down in flames before those who survive manage to stand on their own two feet.

FOR DECADES, THE MEMORY of near terminally depleted stocks of what was the East Coast’s signature commercial species – northern cod – has haunted the zeitgeist of a centuries’ old industry. History tells tales (perhaps apocryphal) of early explorers in the waters off Newfoundland and Nova Scotia stricken dumb by the sight of fish teeming in such abundance that they slowed the course of their ships, and could be plucked from the depths with buckets. Factual or fanciful, the stories set off a global trade in Atlantic seafood that thrived, largely unabated, for hundreds of years.

But, for a multitude of reasons having to do with perennially inattentive fisheries policy, domestic and foreign over-harvesting, inadequate or incomplete resource management, and a wide variety of insufficiently understood scientific factors, the traditional ground fishery began to fail in the early 1980s. By the early 1990s, it was all but dead as the federal government imposed a sweeping moratorium on commercial cod catches. The move devastated communities (particularly in Newfoundland, Cape Breton and Northeastern regions of mainland Nova Scotia), threw thousands of people out of work, bankrupted dozens of harvesting and processing operations, and precipitated one of the biggest and costliest public bailouts of a single industry – fishing license buy-backs, workforce retraining, and emergency relief to hard-hit families – in the nation’s history.

“We should never forget what those days were like,” says Chidley. “We were subsisting in the cod fishery. And I mean it really was subsisting. Some people may say there was a romantic quality, but certainly there wasn’t much of a monetary quality. There was absolutely no disposable income for 95 per cent of the fishers.”

Still, since then, the industry has learned and, in many ways, matured. Indeed, thanks to improvements in data collection, widespread computerization and electronic record keeping, and more sustainable fishing practices in both the near- and offshore grounds, the commercial business has staged something of a comeback. In scope, at least, the context is more international than ever before.

In a global enterprise that’s worth, by some estimates, $240-billion (USD) a year, the gross value of Canada’s own fishery in 2008 included $1.8-billion (CDN) from seafood landings and $4.2-billion from preparation and processing. That same year, the total volume brought ashore at ocean ports, on all coasts across the country, by 52,000 fishers, was nearly a million metric tonnes, to be processed by 22,000 plant workers. Meanwhile, the aggregate value of all fish (including freshwater and farmed) shipments from Canada – to Germany, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, South Korea, and Denmark – was $4-billion, yielding a positive trade balance of nearly $2-billion, and making the country the sixth-largest and most diversely marketed marine exporter in the world.

In all of this, the four Atlantic provinces, which together account for less than 10 per cent of Canada’s population, have been responsible for more than 85 per cent of the nation’s annual seafood outputs, both domestically and internationally (volume, value and employment): In 2008, 772,574 metric tonnes worth of landings, with a value in excess of $1.6-billion; and more than 18,500 registered, licensed fishing vessels plying the cold, clean, coastal waters of the world’s second-largest ocean.

Of course, the real key to this rebound since the bad, old, “cod-damned” days of late 20th century has been the precipitous shift towards harvesting and processing more plentiful and more internationally valued (read: marketable) species along the East Coast. “Today, Atlantic Canada’s commercial bounty from the sea is very broad,” Derek Butler says. “It includes snow crab, cold water shrimp and lobster. And then there’s herring and mackerel, the so-called pelagic fish which live higher up in the water column than ground varieties, like cod and flatfish. We still fish cod, but it is quite a small enterprise, compared to its size of only a generation ago.”

In fact, the big money (if that is the right phrase) is in the shell-fisheries, which replaced the ground catch following the moratorium. Crab and shrimp are now kings in and around Newfoundland and Labrador’s sea shelves, as are oysters and mussels for Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick. And, almost everywhere you travel in the Atlantic region you meet the nearly ubiquitous, multi-million-dollar-a-year lobster cull for fine diners from Halifax to Paris, France.

Consider that in 2008 shellfish accounted for more than 60 per cent of all seafood landed commercially in Atlantic Canada, while Pelagics amounted to 30 per cent, and ground fish a mere 10 per cent, and you can understand the import of Eric Roe’s predominant musings. “I think the industry on the East Coast has managed to turn several important corners over the past few years,” says the Clearwater executive, whose firm employees 1,200 people and owns and operates a fleet of 13 offshore vessels. “We’ve figured out how to harvest the resources more responsibly and sustainably. We’ve figured out how to invest in the future of our operations to continuously supply a growing international appetite for high-quality seafood.”

But (and it’s a big but), “if we can get the policy framework right that addresses resource sustainability and industry profitability, then the opportunity for this industry is still pretty exciting in that we have wonderful renewable sources of protein at a time when the world demand for sustainable seafood is growing.”

To the extent that the practices of a multi-national company with annual revenues approaching $300-million applies to considerably smaller, less economically robust, operators, Jean-Guy d’Entremont and Gerard Chidley do not disagree with the point. “It does come down to business sense,” the former says. “A sustainable fishery has four pillars. There is the economy. There’s the ecology, biology of the fish. There’s the social pillar, which involves jobs. And then there’s the institutional pillar, which is governments working together to monitor and control. It’s the balance of these four pillars that provides a sustainable fishery. As soon as you too much emphasis on one pillar, such as the social one, the economics and the ecology will suffer. ”

Adds Chidley: “Unfortunately, I think there remains some degree of romanticism about the past in some quarters. I mean, all this stuff about the good old days. My dad is 85 years old  and boy he says anybody who wants to go back to the good, old days, well. . .now we should let them go back on their own. Now not a lot of people romanticize the past, but the ones who are saying it all the time are in the media. They don’t have a great big following. But why on Earth would anyone ever want to go back to that? So that’s my real point. We now have the opportunity to build a truly sustainable, long-term fishery for the future.”

On the other hand, and despite these noble sentiments and hopeful projections, there may no longer be any need to bleed the past of its awful memories, as the present seems perilously close to making its own.

IN LIFE OR BUSINESS, it’s only human nature to want to make the most of improving circumstances. So, it’s hard to fault the East Coast fishery, or the two levels of government that minister to its needs, for seeking as much employment as they possibly can from an industry that once figured so crucially in the progress of an entire region. But, as Derek Butler bluntly points out, it’s also human nature to ignore the lessons of the past.

“The problem is,” he says, “after the cod moratorium, we never really got around to true rationalization. As shellfish grew in value and the quotas went up, pressure was put on different governments to increase the number of enterprises fishing those species, and the number of plants processing them. So, as an example, where we started with seven crab plants, we decided to add five more, and then five more after that. Now, in Newfoundland and Labrador, we have 34 or 35 crab plants, and 3,000 crab harvesters. We have 13 shrimp plants and 250 enterprises. The shrimp boats only have an average of 50 days at sea a year. The crab plants are only open for a few months each year. The average per capita crab landing is only 7,000 pounds. And then you have to collect the product and truck it and maintain the wharf infrastructure and all the monitoring and observing that takes place. I ask you, where is the business model in this?”

Is there away to ameliorate the situation by negotiating higher prices for products at the point of sale? Butler laughs grimly and deploys another one of his famous analogies. “Well, you know as well as I that when GM and Chrysler and Ford had their recent issues, no one said the fellow in the car lot had to flip up the price on the vehicles just to make the industry work. The challenge was not asking consumers to pay more for their cars. The challenge was structural to the industry itself. The companies had either too many plants or too much overhead to remain viable in the long run. This is exactly where we are in the fishery, and the market can’t be asked to carry it. First of all, it won’t.”

Then there is the hoary matter of resource limitations. According to the Canada-Newfoundland Fishing Industry Renewal Discussion Paper, released in late 2006, “The total landed value and product value of all species in Newfoundland and Labrador has declined by approximately 25 per cent in recent years due primarily to declines in the crab and shrimp fisheries. During the same period, harvesting and processing costs (i.e. fuel, capital, etc…) increased resulting in a ‘cost-price’ squeeze. This has served to highlight the need for the fishing industry to become more internationally competitive.”

Specifically, the report observes, “It must compete in a global market where China and other low-cost producers dominate the market for frozen groundfish and where production is moving towards secondary products. It must also compete with an increasing world supply of aquaculture fish with seafood products from other jurisdictions, such as Iceland and Norway, who have already successfully adapted their fishing industries.”

Still, at the top of the discussion paper’s list of “domestic industry challenges” – which includes overcapacity, policy renewal, industry structure, workforce, low or unstable wages, seasonality, dependability, varying quality, vessel design, and marketing – is resource fluctuation or decline. Says Butler: “The truth is we are once again in danger of pushing these species the way we did with cod. Science, itself, has said over-capacity compromises our ability to do better fisheries management because it is asking more fish to pay the bill, instead of letting economics take care of itself.”

It would be inaccurate to apply Newfoundland and Labrador’s precise circumstances to all geographic regions, or even segments, of the East Coast fishery. Resource and marketplace conditions for lobster, bi-valves, flatfish, tuna and the plethora of other commercially harvested species, for example, are far too complex, individual and varied to over-generalize, as are the regulatory environments. But it is fair to say that Newfoundland’s current unease is a creeping one, if only because everyone involved in the harvesting and processing of wild, marine animals faces similar challenges of resource management, employment and income, as well as well-founded concerns about long-term sustainability and viability.All of which merely demonstrates there are no easy solutions to the problem of industry rationalization; though there are clues.

Some, like Jean-Guy d’Entremont, favour a more widespread system of individual transferrable quota and enterprise allocations – which would effectively trim the number of people working in the industry as increasing numbers of marginally successful harvesters choose to sell their quotas to their more successful peers. Others think broadening existing “buddy-up” arrangements – which effectively combine enterprises, licenses and individual quotas – may be an efficacious start, if not a permanent balm.

Perhaps the most hopeful development in all of this is the industry’s clear determination to come to grips with its future in a positive, collaborative fashion. A Memorandum of Understanding, signed in July 2009 by the Fish, Food and Allied Workers, Association of Seafood Producers of Newfoundland and Labrador, and the provincial government seeks to “develop a plan to address the long-term structural issues in the province’s fishing industry.”

Or as Clyde Jackman, the province’s minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture, stated in July, “Our province’s fishing industry is overcapitalized and having great difficulty in light of the global economic challenges of the last two years. However, there are structural issues within the industry and we can see the impact of those annually. We will continue to have them until there is a new industry structure in place. The MOU process was designed to provide proposals from the participants for addressing these issues. It is important that the parties develop joint proposals that offer reasonable and practical solutions which will encourage federal government support of the restructuring process.”

And for Derek Butler, this should mean only one thing: “We’ve got to start running the fishery like any other industry, not like a social program.”

No metaphors, no tortured figures of speech; and, as usual, no loss for words.

The East Coast fishery: By the numbers

1990

Total number of fishers (wild fishery) — 64,000
Average age of fishers (wild fishery) — 35
Total value of aquaculture (farmed fishery) — $100-million

2006

Total number of fishers (wild fishery) — 51,000
Average age of fishers (wild fishery) — 44
Total value of aquaculture (farmed fishery) — $400-million

Source: Statistics Canada

2 Comments to “The Long, Hard Tack Back To Bountiful”

  1. This article is what you would expect from a writer … get enough information from so called ‘leaders’ in an industry to write something for the generally uneducated public . The real cause of the industries problems of course are never investigated or ‘gone into’. If they were it would expose the afore mentioned leaders and authorities… offending them and thus most likely ending the interview. The approach by Mr Bruce is what, for the most part, the public has to feed on….scribes cant bite the hand that feeds them….an attitude of history, as it were, that is written by the victors!!!

    You think Mr Bruce realizes the possibility that processors like Mr Butler, or opinions from federaled positioned, successful, fishers, are part of the problem because they flow along with the failed governments policies?? If he does then how come this truth is not part of his article and if not then the article he writes only adds more confusion to the tragic story of NL’s once great fishery.

    So naturally the articles conclusion is…”some form of rationalization is necessary to build long term sustain ability. The nagging question. of course, is how.” Which is but verbal verbatim ad nauseam to those who know the real situation in our Fishery.

    There is no nagging question as to ‘how’ to have long term sustain ability….it’s simply by protecting and restoring our resource, which governments fail to do. The nagging question is, rather, why our governments act as they do not wanting to save the stocks for a healthy sustainable future harvest. phil earle, carbonear, NL 709 596 1176

  2. Avatar Maurice E. Adams // November 11, 2010 at 7:17 pm // Reply

    Nothing rational about fisheries rationalization

    http://www.thetelegram.com/Letters-to-the-editor/2009-03-30/article-1458787/Nothing-rational-about-fisheries-rationalization/1

    Maurice E. Adams
    Paradise, NL 709 773 1564

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*




ADVERTISEMENT